On first impressions, the E7200 seems unremarkable, other than a bargain. Running at a stock 2.53GHz on a 1,066MHz FSB it’s built on a 45nm process with 3MB L2 cache and can be snapped up for around $l20. That alone makes it the best value Core 2 on the market. But hang on, this is built on the new 45nm process, which means it’ll run very cool and with CPUs already running at 3.2GHz on the same process just how fast will this boy run?

Even under normal settings the performance is impressive with it running at 30°C just passively cooled with a cheap $15 cooler. Under load this rises to 50°C, but even that is more than acceptable for day-to-day work and incredible for passive cooling. Feeling brave we initially went straight for 3.2GHz running on a 337MHz FSB and even with the stock cooler we got a stable overclock.

Taking the FSB up to 350MHz showed the first signs of strain. It would boot into Vista, but bluescreen shortly after or during benchmarking. Switching to the Akasa Blue Aurora soon sorted that problem out and once again we were stable, running at 3.33GHz. That’s 800MHz or 30 per cent faster. It was, unfortunately, at this point our fun ran out, as beyond 350MHz our chosen motherboard, a budget ASUS P5LD2-X/1333 ‘lost’ all the SATA hard drives. Even then it was happy to boot to the BIOS at up to a 390MHz FSB (3.7GHz) on the stock core voltage. Proving there’s a lot of overclocking territory left to discover with this beauty.

Overclocking the processor is all about pushing up the front side bus speed. This not only affects the processor, but the memory speed. While many motherboards do enable you to ‘clock-down’ the memory bus it’s always helpful to have performance memory parts installed, alongside your processor and performance cooler.

The first step to good overclocking has nothing to do with settings or indeed your hardware: it’s to make sure you install your cooler correctly. That means don’t overdo the thermal grease. A micron-thin film is all that’s required, place a few blobs, push the heatsink on, remove it, wipe clean and then install it for a better contact. Of course, the BIOS is at the heart of overclocking, while Windows-based tools have somewhat alleviated the need for it, frankly this is still where the real work has to be done. An overclocking motherboard will, of course, greatly help as it will provide better recovery tools and more advanced tweaking options.

If you really want to get the most out of the E7200, then grab yourself a decent cooler. The Akasa Blue Aurora stepped up to the mark nicely here, help us to push the FSB from the stock coolers 320MHz to a cool 350MHz.

About Author
Subscribe to Sandra Prior’s Online Newsletter and get up to date Computer Technology News delivered right to your email box for free. See website for details http://usacomputers.rr.nu and http://sacomputers.rr.nu.

The next six months will see a fundamental change in the market too, with AMD and Intel both introducing new desktop platforms. Intel’s X58 chipset will offer support for the hotly anticipated ‘Nehalem’ processor – not only will this have a new socket (probably called something like LGA1366), but it will also boast an integrated triple-channel, DDR3 memory controller, as well as a new CPU interconnect called QuickPath. AMD’s 800 series meanwhile will support the new AM3 sockets.

As with every other component, motherboards have come a long way from the original IBM PC of 1981. If you’re old enough to remember the first De Lorean DMC-12, perhaps the original PC XT motherboard still casts some dark shadow over your memory? At the time there were certainly wonders to behold; these days, they simply look a mess with integration the last thing on the designers mind and all the I/O having to be decidedly off-board.

The XT had all the same parts as today’s motherboards, they just worked a little slower. Instead of having a dedicated, integrated chipset, the XT used discrete off-the-shelf components: clock generators, DMA controller, interrupt handler, keyboard and bus controllers, a system timer and a real-time clock, along with the CPU, FPU, ROM and system memory. That’s eleven individual integrated-chips along with all the additional components, adding up to one expensive mother of a board. What we might recognize today as a motherboard didn’t appear until 1986, when a company called Chips and Technology offered a single-chipset solution, by rolling most of the previous parts into one. Requiring only a few support chips, it simplified motherboard design, reduced costs and started the trend of ever-greater integration.

Almost all motherboards still use a twin-chipset design, commonly called the North and Southbridges. Intel tries to call it a hub these days, but we’re not sure why. This dual-chipset design balances functionality and manufacturing considerations. The Northbridge is the high-speed part, sitting between the processor bus and connecting it to the graphics, memory – okay, so not AMD – and interface buses. At the other end of the motherboard, the Southbridge handles all the I/O; ATA interfaces, USB, networking and PCI; any legacy interfaces such as floppy drives and ISA slots is often done via a ‘Super 10′ chip.

Chipset makers often offer alternative Southbridges for premium and budget boards. It’s amazing just how robust this design has been. NVIDIA and SLi have offered single-chip solutions in the past, but the vast majority of solutions share features across the pair. In future, it does seem the Southbridge will be relegated to less and less importance, but it’ll still be around at least into 2010, even if it’s just to provide extra PCI Express lanes.

How do the two bridges communicate? And how do they manage to transfer such large

amounts of data so quickly? Originally, the PCI bus was used; perfectly adequate when hard drives ran at 8MB/S and the parallel port was most people’s idea of a high-speed external interface. But with data demands rising exponentially, Intel introduced a dedicated quad-pumped Hub Bus that ran twice as fast as PCI. This turned out to be a revolutionary move: nowadays, every manufacturer uses this type of high-speed link. It’s essential with so much data flying around the Southbridge. Intel now uses DMI running at 2GB/s, VIA has V-Link, SiS has MuTIOL, while HyperTransport has been used by AMD and NVIDIA. Despite the different technologies, they all do the same thing: transport data at high-speed. This bus system also helps simplify motherboard design as the serial links require far fewer physical connections, resulting in faster design turnaround, fewer physical layers and a reduced price.

It is a recurring theme in modern motherboards that old parallel buses are being replaced by new, shiny, high-speed serial ones. The only major exception to this rule being the memory bus: reason enough for users to love serials – from a manufacturing point of view, it simplifies design and cuts costs, as fewer numbers of lines are easier to route around the motherboard and result in less layers being required, significantly reducing costs.

The most obvious addition to the serial party was the introduction of PCI Express. This usurped PCI and AGP as the primary way to add graphics and expansion cards to a PC. Attached to the South or Northbridge, PCIe slots have multiple lanes associated with them -16 for a graphics slot offering 4GB/S worth of bandwidth. The new PCIe v2 standard doubles this rate and is supported by all the latest chipsets. The biggest side-effect of PCIe was the ability for motherboards to suddenly support multiple graphics cards.

As you probably know, NVIDIA offers SLI and AMD CrossFire – the latter also supported on Intel’s high-end X chipsets – for multiple GPU support. Whilst twin 16-lane PCIe slots have been the norm until now, expect new boards to offer three slots, as we move into a period where GPUs will be used for physics acceleration. So it’s a case of more the merrier… Oh, our poor steaming PSUs.

About Author
Subscribe to Sandra Prior’s Online Newsletter and get up to date Computer Technology News delivered right to your email box for free. See website for details http://usacomputers.rr.nu and http://sacomputers.rr.nu.